Keep
Your "A" Players
One
of the best ways to ensure that you will have many issues with
employees is to allow poor performers to continue working at
the same level of low performance day after day. In
the business world today, an “A” player is not measured
the same way grades are given out in high school or college. A
flunking grade in business is 95%. If you are working as
a manager or supervisor in a typical organization, you are spending
95% of your time dealing with the 5% of the employees who are not
measuring up. One example of this is looking at attendance
records. There are 20 work days in a typical month. An
employee who shows up 95% of the time is out one day a month. This
is far from acceptable in most organizations. Whether the
issue is attendance, disruptive behavior or the inability to consistently
meet standards, your “A” players have to pick up the
slack of the slackers. This will have a negative affect
on the morale of your hard working employees.
As
a manager or supervisor, it is your job to ensure that the work
is done as expeditiously as possible. Coaching and discipline
are unpleasant tasks. However, it must be a part of a supervisor’s
everyday job duties. Since it is unpleasant, many avoid
this part of the job. Here are a few things supervisors often
do that can get organizations into trouble.
Ignore the problem by
counting on peer pressure to correct sub-standard performance. This rarely works. What
is more likely to happen is the employees will talk about the ineffectiveness
of the supervisor who does little about the problem. By ignoring
the problem, the risk of losing the good employees is much higher. The
loafer is will stay until told to leave.
Have a group meeting. Instead of dealing
directly with the problem employee, a meeting of all employees
of the work group is held and standards of performance are repeated
with the hope that the slacker will get the hint. All this
accomplishes is wasting the time of the “A” players. Additionally,
the slacker rarely gets the hint.
Transfer the slacker. When the slacker
applies for a job in another department, the supervisor gives the
employee rave reviews about their work habits. When the
transfer is made, one supervisor gives a sigh of relief and the
other just sighs.
Delegate discipline to
a subordinate who is not the direct supervisor of the individual. In these cases a
supervisor asks a trusted employee to work with the slacker to
improve the slacker’s performance. This is not fair
to the trusted employee and it is not fair to the slacker. All
this accomplishes is having your good employee baby sit the problem
child.
Hiding behind a lay off. Often times, there
is not enough documentation to terminate the individual for cause,
so the supervisor chickens out by saying that you have to lay them
off. A month or two later a new employee is hired. Since
everyone is a member of a protected class, you may be looking at
a charge of discrimination.
There
are a few of things to keep in mind. First have measurable
standards. If the employee is not meeting those standards,
it is easy to figure out. An example of a measurable standard
is a shipping clerk has to process 25 shipments per day. If
an employee is only processing 20 a day, the standard is not being
met. The second is to clearly communicate what you expect
from the employee and why the expectations are important to the
company. A
third item to keep in mind is fairness and consistency. Fairness
in that everyone should be given a chance to improve. Consistency
in that the same type of coaching, counseling or discipline should
me delivered for the same type of offenses. To do otherwise
may show favoritism and possible discrimination.